are there fake gold waltham watches

Table of Contents

size:209mm * 178mm * 61mm
color:Cyan
SKU:727
weight:467g

Old Waltham Pocket Watches Value

What you have is a perfectly genuine Waltham Model 1888 AmWCo Grade 16 size 7 jewel watch in a Dennison gold-filled case, made in the early 1900s. About 11,500 of .

15 Most Valuable Waltham Watches Identification And Value Guide

There is not gold mark on the inside of the watch. The watch is from late 1890s per the serial number of the movement. There is a small diamond on the back of the watch. Someone told .

[Waltham] [identify] is this watch real and what’s the

Real gold Waltham pocket watches will include a stamp on the rear of the case cover indicating the karat of gold used to create the watch. Several other stamped lines may also indicate a .

How to Tell if a Waltham Watch is Authentic

It is a Waltham Grade 220 pocket watch from around 1905. The movement is not especially high end or valuable; a lot of value will depend on whether the case is solid gold (I can’t tell but you probably can). The dial has a very unfortunate W .

found a waltham watch, is it real?

Waltham Pocket Watch Years Age Unique & Collectible Features Serial Numbers Estimated Value 1850s (Pre-Public Domain Watches) 164 – 173 years 1.7 – 1.9 inch .

Curious Waltham pocketwatchfake, altered, or real

Description: Waltham White Gold Filled Pocket Watch The piece is a 17-jewel 14k white gold-filled Waltham pocket watch. The watch serial number is 24192723, indicating that it was manufactured in 1922. A W W Co Waltham USA is stamped on the plate on

[Question] real or fake longines? : r/Watches

In January, 1859, the Waltham Improvement Co. and the Appleton, Tracy & Co. merged to form the American Watch Co. Waltham continued to manufacture watches until .

value

The box opens and says waltham, the watch appears to be gold, the face has a w just below the 12, below that it says waltham and above the 6 says quartz. On the back it .

WALTHAM POCKET WATCHES

Hi, I came across this 16s Waltham Royal which looks to be an 1888 model, s/n 5554591 which would date it to 1891. My problem is that it is stamped 21 Jewels. I can’t find a .

Why havent vintage Waltham’s held value?

Absolutely fake. For starters, that’s a Chinese (Longines is Swiss) DG2813 movement. Compared to the genuine watches in this listing and this listing, there are some additional details that clearly indicate that the watch in this post is .

First off, you gotta understand, Waltham was HUGE back in the day. Like, *the* American watch company. We’re talking pocket watches especially, built tough, and yeah, some were cased in gold or gold-filled materials. That naturally makes them attractive to counterfeiters, right? If it looks valuable, someone’s gonna try to fake it.

Now, I’ve seen some real doozies. Like, a Longines (completely different brand!) with a Chinese movement being passed off as legit. (Seriously, people, do a little research!) And when someone asks, “Is this Waltham real?” and it says “quartz” on the dial… well, that’s a massive red flag. Walthams were *not* making quartz watches in their heyday. Quartz is way later. It’s like finding a CD player in a Model T Ford. Just… wrong.

Then you got the whole “gold-filled” thing. It’s not solid gold, obviously. It’s a base metal (usually brass) with a layer of gold bonded to it. That layer *can* be thin, and it *can* wear off over time. So, you might see a watch that *looks* gold, but it’s actually got areas where the brass is showing through. That doesn’t necessarily mean it’s fake, but it does impact its value, and it makes it harder to authenticate sometimes.

And the serial numbers! Oof. Serial numbers are your friend when verifying a Waltham. They can tell you the year of manufacture, the grade of the movement, all sorts of good stuff. But, and this is a big but, fake watches often have either completely bogus serial numbers, or they might try to copy a real serial number from a common model. So, just because a serial number exists, doesn’t guarantee authenticity. You gotta cross-reference it with other details.

Here’s my personal opinion: the biggest problem isn’t *necessarily* that someone’s trying to pass off a completely fake Waltham as real. It’s that people alter them. For instance, you might find a Waltham pocket watch movement, a perfectly legit one, crammed into a fancy new case that’s *trying* to look old, or even a gold one. Or they might “upgrade” the jewels, like that 16s Waltham Royal with 21 jewels that shouldn’t exist for that model year. It’s like taking a classic car and putting a modern engine in it – it might run better, but it’s not original anymore, and it throws off the value.

Honestly, it’s a minefield. If you find a Waltham that looks too good to be true, especially if it’s supposedly solid gold and super cheap… well, trust your gut. Get it checked out by a reputable watchmaker who knows their vintage Walthams. They can spot the telltale signs. Don’t just rely on a quick Google search or some random forum post (unless, of course, it’s *this* one! 😉).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *